For Christmas I got a fascinating present from a buddy - my extremely own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (fantastic title) bears my name and my photo on its cover, and it has glowing reviews.

Yet it was written by AI, with a couple of basic prompts about me supplied by my good friend Janet.

It's an interesting read, and uproarious in parts. But it likewise meanders rather a lot, and is someplace between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It imitates my chatty style of composing, but it's likewise a bit repeated, qoocle.com and very verbose. It might have gone beyond Janet's prompts in collecting data about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading innovation reporter ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a mysterious, repetitive hallucination in the type of my feline (I have no animals). And there's a metaphor on nearly every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of companies online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I called the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had offered around 150,000 customised books, generally in the US, photorum.eclat-mauve.fr since rotating from assembling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The firm utilizes its own AI tools to create them, based upon an open source large language design.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who developed it, can order any further copies.

There is presently no barrier to anybody developing one in any person's name, consisting of stars - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around violent content. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer specifying that it is fictional, created by AI, and developed "entirely to bring humour and delight".

Legally, the copyright comes from the firm, however Mr Mashiach worries that the item is planned as a "customised gag present", and the books do not get sold even more.

He hopes to broaden his range, producing various genres such as sci-fi, and perhaps using an autobiography service. It's designed to be a light-hearted form of consumer AI - selling AI-generated items to human consumers.

It's likewise a bit frightening if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least due to the fact that it probably took less than a minute to create, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound just like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have actually revealed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then produce comparable content based upon it.

"We should be clear, when we are discussing data here, we actually indicate human creators' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, wiki.dulovic.tech which campaigns for AI firms to regard developers' rights.

"This is books, this is articles, this is photos. It's works of art. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to learn how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a song including AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and kenpoguy.com they had actually not granted it. It didn't stop the track's developer attempting to choose it for a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists were fake, it was still hugely popular.

"I do not believe making use of generative AI for imaginative purposes need to be banned, but I do believe that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on individuals's work without authorization should be banned," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be extremely powerful however let's build it morally and fairly."

OpenAI states Chinese competitors utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have selected to block AI designers from trawling their online content for training functions. Others have chosen to team up - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for instance.

The UK federal government is considering an overhaul of the law that would enable AI designers to utilize developers' content on the internet to help develop their designs, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "madness".

He explains that AI can make advances in locations like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and destroying the livelihoods of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is also strongly versus removing copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth developers, 2.4 million jobs and a great deal of joy," says the Baroness, who is likewise an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is undermining one of its best carrying out industries on the vague pledge of growth."

A federal government spokesperson stated: "No relocation will be made up until we are definitely positive we have a useful plan that provides each of our goals: increased control for right holders to help them certify their material, access to premium product to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more transparency for best holders from AI developers."

Under the UK government's new AI plan, a nationwide data library including public information from a wide variety of sources will also be made readily available to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to boost the safety of AI with, to name a few things, firms in the sector needed to share details of the workings of their systems with the US government before they are released.

But this has now been rescinded by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do instead, but he is stated to want the AI sector to deal with less policy.

This comes as a variety of lawsuits against AI companies, championsleage.review and especially versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been gotten by everybody from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and larsaluarna.se even a comedian.

They claim that the AI firms broke the law when they took their content from the web without their permission, and used it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "fair usage" and are for that reason exempt. There are a variety of elements which can constitute reasonable usage - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it gathers training information and akropolistravel.com whether it should be spending for it.

If this wasn't all sufficient to consider, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the past week. It ended up being one of the most downloaded free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it established its innovation for a portion of the cost of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's existing supremacy of the sector.

When it comes to me and a profession as an author, I think that at the moment, if I actually desire a "bestseller" I'll still need to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the current weakness in generative AI tools for bigger tasks. It is full of errors and hallucinations, and it can be rather difficult to check out in parts due to the fact that it's so long-winded.

But offered how rapidly the tech is evolving, I'm not exactly sure the length of time I can stay confident that my substantially slower human writing and editing skills, are much better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest developments in international technology, with analysis from BBC correspondents all over the world.

Outside the UK? Register here.